About: Why almost all coal was made at the same time
So this video was quite rushed because I wanted to get it out in time for the #teamtrees
launch. Here are a couple of things I got wrong:
Not ALL coal was made during the carboniferous period. There exists some younger coal here and there that formed under rare conditions that enabled it in spite of the presence of capable fungi. I did film myself saying that but it was lost it my rushed edit.
Photosynthesis is more complicated than I described. It involves water for a start. And it seems that the oxygen released during photosynthesis comes from the H₂O not the CO₂. Though I haven't be able to verify that.
And here's a non-correction! The thing I was holding up at the start was not
charcoal. It was a coal dust briquette. You could argue that the briquette was made recently but the coal it's made of is old!
So yeah, the thrust of the video still stands but it's been a learning opportunity for me!
A final thought on planting trees for carbon capture. A lot of comments saying "what's the point? When the trees die the decomposers will release the CO₂ back into the atmosphere. But really this is more about planting *forests*. In a forest, when a tree dies, another tree grows in its place recapturing the carbon. But also, it's my understanding that it takes a very long time to release the CO₂. Like hundreds of years. So in terms of tackling climate change which is a problem of human time scales, it's a useful endeavour.
Noah's flood, that's why?
I guess Noah's Flood😑 saves you a lot of time thinking
It all happens at the same time... nothing more than like 60 million years
There is a mini mistake when you say O2 comes from the breaking of O-C-O; CO2 is chemically "stacked" into glucose (fructose, cellulose, lignine...), whereas the O atoms from O2 come from water molecules ;)
Trees don't cost a dollar what a rip off (they grow from seeds). Also we need carbon in the atmosphere to stop us freezing.
im fucking sick of hearing about team trees
Nobody got mad at those trees for changing the climate way back in the day
Responsible for coal is first of all the flood. I thought it should be a one time event 😃? !
on top of that evolution is a non existing idea, that has never been proven to be correct. and as it turns out; the driving processes that shoudl (SUPPOSEDLY) drive evolution are thye same processes that make " evolution " impossible... why ? well simple... the influences are DESTRUCTIVE and not CONSTRUCTIVE towards the genetic material DNA.
Which makes sense since they are usually high energetic radiaoctive things that only destroy things and we try to avoid in order to refrain from disseases like cancer and other genetically disorder diseases.
we know this YET still science accept them as driving forces for the silly idea which is known as evolution.
what we DO see genetically how ever is the very 100% OPPOSITE of evolution and hat is DEGENERATION of genetic material... and yes agreed that leads to some changes in organisms ... BUT is mistakingly called evolution... but its not since DEGENERATION is always asociated with LOSS of genetic material whil evolution is supposedly the proces to GAIN genetic information......
now using destructive forces can NEVER make nature GAIN information only LOSE information including genetic information....
so sofar things as evolution remain a MYTH and not a proven theory..... it is just nothing more than an idea even as a hypothesis it has long been proven to be incorrect.
Well steve you may be a nice guy but here you are wrong...
Agreed all world wide coal formed in a very short period of time. But it was not 300 million yrs ago. It was only 4500 yrs ago... during the Noah Flood. At the same time the majprity of the dinosaurs died off, geological features formed; stratified earth layers formed, continents started to drift rappidly, diamond formed, oil got formed and so on.
We know this because of the stoill high content of C14 in coal, in dinosaur bones, fresh meat in dinbosaur bones...
You see people are being misled by teachings of millions of years, but this is no supported by c14 dating methods,
You see after millions of yrs there CANNOT BE any C14 left is coal or dino bones... YET , there is........so conlcusion these items cannot be millions of yrs old.
C14 is totaly gone in 600.000 yrs....and detectably gone in 50.000 yrs. so IF C14 is found in Dino bones or coal... IT CANNOT be millons of yrs old it is way less older than people think or are being taught....
Oh and by the way Noahs arek was found as well... some decades ago already by a guy called Ron Wyatt.
The turkish government also made a museum in that same area displaying all items that were dug up from the ground close to the ark....
Nope. Photosynthesis doesn't separate the O2 in CO2 from the carbon. The O2 released by photosynthesis is from the splitting of water. The hydrogen is used to reduce the CO2 to carbohydrates (sugars), generic formula CH2O, and the oxygen is released to the atmosphere.
Thanks for teaching me this about trees, actually very interesting
putin sold syberian forest to china
Wow this video has like lots of factual errors. I’m not gonna tell you what those factual errors are. But they are there trust me
Team trees actually succeeded with the 20 million trees goal just a few weeks before the switch to 2020! 👍🎉🌱🌲🌳🌴🌿🌱
over 1000 brazilian loggers disliked
Tippe top or rattle back. How do they work?
Why do you hate plants? You want to remove plant food from the air and starve them!